I had just turned on my computer and was getting settled in at my desk one recent morning when I came across this headline: “Northwestern’s Journalism Program Offers Students Internships with Prestige, But No Paycheck.”

I almost spit out my coffee.

Here it was, 2014, and I was reading that the world-renowned Medill School of Journalism offered a great education for about $15,000 in quarterly tuition, along with unpaid internships.

What, in the name of Sander Vanocur, was going on over at that place? I wondered.

Apparently, during their mandatory quarter in Journalism Residency, as it is known, Northwestern journalism students would work full time at standout media organizations such as CNN and Conde Nast. That is, at least until the good folks at Conde Nast dropped their internship program last year, presumably because they were tired of being questioned why they wouldn’t pay their interns.

The way it’s worked with the Journalism Residency program, employers pay Medill $1,250 for every intern placed, but don’t pay the student. The intern does receive academic credit and a small stipend from Northwestern for relocation expenses that range from $600 to $1,200, if necessary. But that hardly makes it easy for a college student to decide whether or not to take an internship, and risk going broke (broker?) in the process. Most internships are acquired during a student’s junior or senior years, just when the student loans and other bills are really starting to stack up.

To me, this almost smacks of slave labor. While an internship at a place like CNN or Conde Nast is unquestionably valuable for the student, how can news organizations expect to attract the top talent if they aren’t willing to pay at least a minimum wage, and so that at least a student can afford to take the 3-4 months off to work and live in another city?

The answer: they can’t. And, as a result, some organizations—News Corp., NBC Universal, Inc., Conde Nast and Gawker Media, to name a few—have faced lawsuits from nonpaid interns who argue they should have been paid at least something.

Look, I was once an intern myself. I recall working in the news bureau of a school district and, in addition to receiving a full three units of course credit, I received a minimum wage salary (well, it was $1.65 at the time, but still). Plus, I was given a nominal stipend for “gas and mileage”.

Heck, I remember receiving about $300 a month for serving as executive editor of my campus newspaper one semester. And this was in 1974!

For its part, Medill has asked companies to consider paying at least minimum wage to all its future interns.

But, how many organizations will instead decide to drop their internship programs rather than foot the bill in these tough economic times?

Of course, many companies do pay interns, even if it’s just minimum salary. Still, as much as news organizations complain about the inability to find good talent these days, you would think they would be willing to invest a little, just a little, to keep alive the opportunity to attract quality talent.

This whole (bad) business of unpaid internships needs to end.

If nothing else, there’s another good reason to end unpaid internships: legal protection in the workplace. Last year, a New York federal judge threw out an intern’s lawsuit charging a media firm with sexual harassment because only paid employees are covered by the city’s human rights law. The U.S. Civil Rights Act dictates only paid workers are considered employees, with the right to sue their employers.

Comments

Non-paying internships discriminate

William MacKenzie | Sunday, March 9, 2014

Non-paid internships mean only students who can afford to live and work somewhere without pay can afford to take the internships, so kids from financially stressed families who need to work to pay for college lose out and privileged kids get the leg up. Read: Interns ought to be paid, http://bit.ly/1h5pp1X

Add Comment