Search:      
E & P Web
  America's Oldest Journal Covering the Newspaper Industry Saturday, November 21, 2009  
 

McClatchy Launches Digital Editions on the Kindle
As 'NYT' Chicago Pages Debut, Local Papers Deliver 'Exclusives'
EXCLUSIVE: Newspaper Sites' Time Spent Dropped in October
UPDATE: AP Layoff Count Hits 90, Meets Goal
'Indy Star' Leads Fight for Lobbying-Laws Reform
Ad Revenue Sees 13th Consecutive Quarter of Decline in Q3
NYT Co. Board Amends Bylaws to Ensure Transparency in Shareholder Nominations
40 Years Ago Today: Photos of My Lai First Appeared But Photographer Often Forgotten
New 'Fitz & Jen' Business Podcast: Newspaper Stocks Beginning to Lose Their Juice?
'E&P' on Twitter: Here's How to Hit the Tweet Spot!

| This week's top stories

    Share on LinkedIn
Attorney General Threatens to Go After Reporters




Published: May 21, 2006 1:10 PM ET

WASHINGTON Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said Sunday he believes journalists can be prosecuted for publishing classified information, citing an obligation to national security.

The nation's top law enforcer also said the government will not hesitate to track telephone calls made by reporters as part of a criminal leak investigation, but officials would not do so routinely and randomly.

"There are some statutes on the book which, if you read the language carefully, would seem to indicate that that is a possibility," Gonzales said, referring to prosecutions. "We have an obligation to enforce those laws. We have an obligation to ensure that our national security is protected."

In recent months, journalists have been called into court to testify as part of investigations into leaks, including the unauthorized disclosure of a CIA operative's name as well as the National Security Agency's warrantless eavesdropping program.

Gonzales said he would not comment specifically on whether The New York Times should be prosecuted for disclosing the NSA program last year based on classified information.

He also denied that authorities would randomly check journalists' records on domestic-to-domestic phone calls in an effort to find journalists' confidential sources.

"We don't engage in domestic-to-domestic surveillance without a court order," Gonzales said, under a "probable cause" legal standard.

But he added that the First Amendment right of a free press should not be absolute when it comes to national security. If the government's probe into the NSA leak turns up criminal activity, prosecutors have an "obligation to enforce the law."

"It can't be the case that that right trumps over the right that Americans would like to see, the ability of the federal government to go after criminal activity," Gonzales told ABC's "This Week."




(letters@editorandpublisher.com)


Back to Advanced Search




Ads by Google