McClatchy CEO Pruitt: We've Got No Beef With Google Ken Doctor's 'Newsonomics,' a Fitz & Jen Book Review Guild: 'Post-Dispatch' Contract Talks Turning 'More Acrimonious' Bollinger Named 'Aberdeen American News' Publisher While Leone on Medical Leave Remembering Subscribers in Mill Valley -- By Painting Stripes in Front of Their Houses Media General Also Paying High Price To Spread Out Debt UPDATE: St. Louis Gay Newspaper Comes Back From Dead, But as Magazine Minneapolis 'Star Tribune' Achieves Record Web Month Union, Management Set Tuesday Meeting on 'Newsday' Financial Status 'N.Y. Times' Ombudsman: I'd Transfer Jerusalem Bureau Chief With Son in Israeli Army | This week's top stories Mediaweek: Top Headlines

WASHINGTON Four years after her CIA cover was blown in a newspaper column, Valerie Plame is settling scores with the Bush administration, Republican lawmakers and the journalists involved in the White House leak scandal.

Plame writes about the leak, the fallout and the perjury trial of former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby in her memoir, "Fair Game: My Life as a Spy, My Betrayal by the White House." The book is to be released Tuesday, but The Associated Press purchased it early.

In her first interview since Bush administration officials outed her as a covert CIA agent, Plame (who goes by Valerie Wilson) reveals to CBS "60 Minutes" on Sunday night that she was involved in preventing Iran from building a nuclear weapon.

CBS, in the form of Katie Couric, reports that she was “involved in one highly classified mission to deliver fake nuclear weapons blueprints to Tehran.” Plame on the program remains coy about this. Her role in Iran intelligence was first revealed by Larisa Alexandrovna of the Raw Story site in February 2006. (See partial transcript at bottom.)

In her book, she offers harsh words for President Bush, whom she assails for administration "arrogance and intolerance." She also said criticism of her husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, was a "dress rehearsal" for the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth effort that impugned Sen. John Kerry's war record during his failed presidential campaign in 2004.

"It was classic Karl Rove: go after your enemy's strong point," Plame writes, saying Bush's former political adviser was behind both efforts. "In Joe's case it was that he told the truth; in Kerry's case, it was his exemplary military service."

Plame often casts herself as a spectator to the scandal. She discusses being uncomfortable in the limelight, even as she poses for magazine photographs, attends posh Washington fundraisers and is whisked backstage at a rock concert as her husband becomes one of the Iraq war's most public critics.

She describes arriving home one day to find Vanity Fair photographers in her kitchen preparing a photo for the magazine's cover.

"I did not listen to my instincts and threw my extreme caution about public exposure to the wind," she wrote. "In no time, the beauty team had me made up."

Plame began attracting attention after syndicated columnist Robert Novak revealed her identity in 2003 in a story about Wilson's CIA-sponsored trip to Niger.

"I felt like I had been sucker-punched, hard, in the gut," Plame said, recalling reading Novak's column.

Wilson said the Niger trip debunked some prewar intelligence about Iraq's nuclear ambitions, yet the intelligence still found its way into Bush's State of the Union address that year. Plame believes she was outed as retribution for her husband's comments.

Numerous behind-the-scenes details of the leak surfaced at Libby's trial and Plame cannot fill in many blanks. At least four Bush administration officials discussed Plame's identity with reporters - Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage, White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer, Rove and Libby - but have said little about it publicly.

Libby is the only person charged in the case and was convicted not of leaking but of lying and obstructing the probe. Plame recalls that her husband had convinced himself Rove would be charged and she writes of being "puzzled and angry" upon learning he wouldn't be.

Attorney Robert Luskin said Wednesday he would not discuss the book because Plame's comments "shed no light on the public record."

Though the book represents the first time Plame has publicly discussed the scandal in detail, few revelations were left after the monthlong trial, countless news articles and her congressional testimony.

Some of the details Plame had planned to offer, including discussion of her CIA career and her job responsibilities, are redacted from the book. Sometimes that means whole pages of blacked-out text. The CIA objected to the material's release and Plame lost a court fight to include it.

As a solution, journalist Laura Rozen recounts Plame's early years in the agency as part of the book's lengthy afterword. Rozen, who writes for liberal publications The American Prospect and Mother Jones, is not covered by the CIA's publication rules.

Critics have argued for years that if Plame was concerned about her CIA cover, she should not have let Wilson discuss his mission to Niger publicly nor write about it in the New York Times. She touches on this only briefly in the book, saying neither of them ever considered the possibility it would jeopardize her cover.

Plame also revisits the debate over whether she suggested her husband for the Niger trip. Government officials have testified she did. In her book, she says a CIA colleague suggested it and a supervisor asked Wilson to come in to discuss it.

She harshly criticizes a Senate intelligence panel that investigated the leak. Testifying before a committee of young staffers, she said, "felt like a setup." She criticized the "Republican senators' complete disregard for the truth" and said they twisted the testimony.

Plame said the CIA refused to let her colleague clarify that it was he who first suggested Wilson for the trip.

She has kind words for Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, who led the leak investigation and forced several journalists to testify about their sources. She said she didn't understand why "well-meaning but self-righteous talking heads" decried that effort.

"It was the Pentagon Papers or Watergate turned on its head," she writes, adding, "These reporters were allowing themselves to be exploited by the administration and were obstructing the investigation."

After reading a Washington Post editorial criticizing her husband, Plame writes that she "suddenly understood what it must have felt like to live in the Soviet Union and have only the state propaganda entity, Pravda, as the source of news about the world."

The book's title is drawn from a comment Rove is said to have made about Wilson's wife being "fair game." "The next time we were in line for Communion," she writes, "I would pass him the wafer plate and whisper softly, 'My name's Fair Game, what's yours?'"

A partial '60 Minutes' transcript follows.
*

COURIC: What went through your mind when you saw your name in print?

PLAME: Oh, it was horrifying, absolutely horrifying.

COURIC: She served 20 years in the CIA, many undercover in the agency’s counterproliferation division, rising to top positions and confronting one of the most ominous threats of our time.

PLAME: Our mission was to make sure that the bad guys, basically, did not get nuclear weapons.

COURIC: When senior administration officials leaked her name to reporters, they may have exposed other spies and damaged operations targeting Iran. CBS News has learned that she was involved in one highly classified mission to deliver fake nuclear weapons blueprints to Tehran. It was called Operation Merlin, and it was first revealed in a book by investigative reporter James Risen.

COURIC: Are you familiar with that?

PLAME: I don’t think I can tell you.

COURIC: He said the idea was to give the Iranians blueprints for the bomb that were seriously flawed to set them back. Does that sound like something the counter-proliferation division would do?

PLAME: I think I can say it sounds like a good idea.

COURIC: Were you surprised to read about Operation Merlin in the press?

PLAME: Indeed.

COURIC: Is that problematic for the CIA?

PLAME: Leaks are always bad news.

COURIC: She should know, revealing for the first time that the leak of her name had serious repercussions.

PLAME: I can tell you all the intelligence services in the world were running my name through their databases to see did anyone by this name come in the country? When? Do we know anything about it? Where did she stay? Who did she see?

COURIC: And what would be the ramifications of that?

PLAME: Well, it was very serious. It puts in danger, if not shuts down, the operations that I had worked on.