In Account of Bill Clinton Tirade, ‘NYT’ Omits One Key Word

By: Greg Mitchell

Apparently the great Grey Lady is still a bit modest. In its account of the Huffington Post scoop on Bill Clinton’s tirade against Todd Purdum, The New York Times today quoted some of the ex-president’s epithets, including “sleazy” and “slimy” but drew the line at “scumbag.”

Other leading news outlets were not so coy.

Clinton, of course, was responding to the quite negative profile about him written by Purdum for this month’s Vanity’s Fair. He apologized last night for some of his “inappropriate” language, captured by Huff Post’s Mayhill Fowler. One wonders if he would not have done that if he had not used the word “scumbag.”

The Times’ Michael Luo writes today, “According to the Huffington Post Web site, Mr. Clinton, as he worked the rope line at an event here, called Mr. Purdum ‘sleazy,’ ‘slimy’ and ‘dishonest.’ Speaking to a reporter for the Web site, Mr. Clinton said the article was part of a pattern of media bias against Mrs. Clinton and in favor of her rival for the Democratic nomination, Senator Barack Obama.”

But Shailagh Murray and Anne Kornblut of The Washington Post went the full monty, explaining that Clinton “called Purdum ‘sleazy’ and a ‘scumbag’ in comments to a reporter for the Huffington Post, a liberal Web site, leading a spokesman for the candidate to issue an apology.”

National Journal’s “Hotline” site noted: “Dem strategist James Carville, on B. Clinton calling Purdum a ‘scumbag’: ‘I think he subsequently said he shouldn’t have used that language.'”

The Chicago Tribune’s popular The Swamp blog: “Reminded that Purdum is married to Clinton’s former press secretary Dee Dee Myers, Clinton responded in part: ‘That’s all right — he’s still a scumbag.'” Others citing the word include a wide range of sources: Newsday, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, AOL News,, and many more.

The CNN Web site: “Calling Purdum a ‘scumbag,’ Clinton said ‘he’s one of the guys that propagated all those lies about Whitewater for Kenneth Starr. He’s just a dishonest guy — can’t help it.'”

But USA Today’s Mark Memmott and Jill Lawrence chose, or were forced, to follow the Times’ policy, explaining: “Three of the words Clinton used that we can repeat here are ‘sleazy,’ ‘dishonest’ and ‘slimy.'”

The Times’ Caucus blog item also failed to mention the most loaded word.
Greg Mitchell’s new book is So Wrong for So Long: How the Press, the Pundits — and the President — Failed on Iraq.

Follow by Email
Visit Us

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *