Meta’s surprise decision to scrap its fact-checking partnerships — blindsiding journalists involved in the program and putting some out of work — is part of a much bigger shift in media and politics.
The very notion of fact-checking is under assault by a wide array of fact-challenged politicians and interest groups. Particularly on the right, “fact-check” has been turned into a dirty word, one that presupposes the fact-checker is actually suppressing some inconvenient truth.
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg played right into that assumption on Tuesday when he insulted fact-checkers as “too politically biased” and said they “have destroyed more trust than they’ve created, especially in the U.S.”
Comments
No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here