Journalist’s lawsuit prompts FAA to abandon no fly zone near DHS vehicles

The FAA dropped the drone restrictions after RCFP attorneys sued the agency on behalf of photojournalist Rob Levine

Posted

The Federal Aviation Administration has withdrawn unconstitutional restrictions that criminalized drone flights near federal immigration enforcement operations — a direct response to a legal challenge that attorneys from the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press filed on behalf of photojournalist Rob Levine.

The FAA’s sweeping, nationwide flight restrictions, which were implemented in January, prohibited drones from flying within 3,000 lateral feet and 1,000 vertical feet of U.S. Department of Homeland Security “facilities and mobile assets.” The agency threatened criminal and civil penalties for drone operators who violated the no fly zone.

Represented by Reporters Committee attorneys Grayson Clary, Adam A. Marshall, and Renee Griffin, Levine asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to throw out the restrictions, arguing that there is no means of verifying in advance whether DHS vehicles — such as unmarked cars driven by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents — are operating in a given location. “The result has been a grave chilling effect on the lawful use of drones,” Reporters Committee attorneys argued in a motion filed last week.

Click here to read more.

Comments

No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here


Scroll the Latest Job Opportunities From The Media Job Board