More E&P TECH REPORTING
Following the money behind federal political appointees can require digging through thousands of documents scattered across government agencies. ProPublica has done much of that legwork for journalists. In this E&P Quick Read, E&P’s Editor-in-Chief Gretchen A. Peck reveals how ProPublica’s “Trump Team Financials” project combines data, technology and accountability journalism.
As AI-generated cartoons and columns make their way onto opinion pages, newsrooms face increasingly urgent questions about standards, transparency and trust. In his latest “News Media Today” op-ed column, E&P’s Rob Tornoe examines some recent controversies over AI-generated content and argues that publishers need clear rules for how — and where — the technology is used.
TASAKA'S TECH TALK
What can a self-driving car teach news publishers about AI? Quite a lot, according to Guy Tasaka. In his September E&P “Tasaka’s Tech Talk” op-ed, he argues that publishers should stop framing AI primarily as a way to cut costs and instead demonstrate how it delivers measurable benefits to readers and advertisers. Drawing lessons from Waymo’s safety record, Tasaka offers a roadmap for making AI not just more useful, but more worthy of audience trust.
What happens when Google stops sending readers to news websites? In his “News Media Today” column this month, E&P’s Rob Tornoe explores “Google Zero,” the devastating impact of AI search on publishers large and small, and why many news organizations now believe they must prepare for a future where Google delivers answers — but not audiences.
What does it take for a newsroom to prosper on social media in 2026? In this exclusive Q&A, E&P’s Bob Miller discusses social-first content and platform performance with Travis Lyles, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution’s director of social media. Lyles implores news media publishers to think of social media not only as a driver of traffic, but as a critical component of a long-term audience strategy.
Inside newsrooms, artificial intelligence (AI) is sparking some of the most important conversations the industry has had in years. AI is now at the heart of Guild negotiations. Bullish news media executives are increasingly eager for AI adoption and the promise of productivity gains. And in the newsroom, journalists are figuring out where AI helps and where it falls short. E&P’s Diane Sylvester looks at the internal AI debates within news organizations that are working through real questions about trust, ethics and transparency.
Tech Talk
Artificial intelligence has already begun reshaping journalism, but according to media strategist and former newspaper executive Guy Tasaka, the next evolution may have an even greater impact on local news organizations. In this month’s column, Tasaka argues that while generative AI helped publishers work faster, the emergence of agentic AI — autonomous systems capable of planning, executing and completing complex tasks with minimal human oversight — could fundamentally change how local media companies operate, innovate and grow despite limited staff and shrinking budgets.
Publishers do not have a CRM problem. They have a revenue visibility problem. In this E&P sponsored webinarWorkbooks CRM CEO John Cheney and Business Development Director Ken Campbell argued that as media companies juggle advertising, subscriptions, events, first-party data and AI, the real challenge is no longer simply collecting information. It is turning disconnected customer data into clearer sales strategy, stronger advertiser relationships and more predictable revenue growth.
News Media Today
E&P columnist Rob Tornoe says a recent viral video featuring a former NFL head coach left him more uneasy than amused. For the first time, he couldn’t immediately tell if what he was watching was real or a convincing AI-generated deepfake. That moment, he writes, underscored how blurred the line between fact and fabrication has become — and how even seasoned journalists now struggle to trust their own eyes. As Tornoe explores in his latest column, deepfakes are no longer crude internet novelties but powerful, accessible tools reshaping political campaigns, public perception and the fragile foundation of media trust.
The internet once promised publishers limitless reach — then siphoned away their revenue. Now, generative AI threatens to deliver answers without clicks, leaving journalism with vanishing audiences and empty ad slots. Court battles may drag on for years, but a new crop of AI marketplaces is moving fast to fill the gap, offering publishers something they haven’t had since Google and Facebook ate their lunch: a way to get paid for their content. TollBit, ProRata, Cloudflare and Perplexity each claim they’ve cracked the code. The question is whether these models represent a lifeline — or just another false dawn.
Tech Talk
In his latest “Tasaka’s Tech Talk,” Guy Tasaka draws a stark comparison between farmers who clung to horses in the early 20th century and publishers who hesitate to embrace AI today. Just as tractors multiplied productivity and transformed agriculture, AI is rapidly becoming the engine that will separate thriving media companies from those stuck in the past. Tasaka argues that the choice is clear: embrace the tools that expand capacity, speed and efficiency — or risk being outpaced by competitors who already have.
With newsroom jobs shrinking and freelance rates collapsing, more journalists are turning to AI gig platforms like Outlier to make ends meet. The work ranges from editing grammar to testing models for harmful outputs — sometimes at rates as low as $10 an hour after unpaid training. Advocates warn that while the gigs offer short-term relief, they also carry hidden costs: burnout, poor pay and ethical dilemmas about helping build the very systems disrupting journalism.
Artificial intelligence is no longer just a Silicon Valley experiment — it’s showing up in the workflows of scrappy startups, statewide broadcasters and national newsletter networks. From a small New Jersey outlet using AI to publish a dozen daily newsletters, to Michigan Public building a searchable transcript database of hundreds of town meetings, to 6AM City scaling community newsletters to more than 400 cities, the experiments are multiplying. The lesson? Generative AI proves most powerful not when it replaces journalists, but when it’s matched to newsroom needs — filtering vital health bulletins, digging through government records or automating tedious production work. As Bob Sillick explores, AI’s true value in media is emerging not in theory, but in practice.