The local news business remains under intense financial pressure, but Sara April sees reasons for optimism. As president of media merger and acquisition firm Dirks, Van Essen & April, she has a front-row view of who is buying community publications and why. The latest transactions detailed in their Q2 M&A Report suggest that a new and varied group of owners is entering the market, often because they believe local journalism remains essential.
Different buyers see different opportunities
There is no single formula that makes a local newspaper attractive, according to April. Buyers enter the market with different strengths, goals and investment strategies. “What makes an operation attractive to one buyer is different from what makes it attractive to another buyer,” she said, emphasizing that every potential acquisition is case-specific.
Some buyers are drawn to publications with deep community roots and strong journalism. April cited the sale of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, describing it as “a newspaper operation that was still deeply entrenched in its community” with a robust newsroom. The local buyer, she said, wanted to continue journalism in a community where he had lived for generations.
Other buyers see an opportunity to improve an operation. One might seek a publication that has not fully developed its web presence, while another may want an established digital subscription business. Across those different strategies, April said the central questions remain: “How strong is that franchise still in the market?” and “How diverse are its streams of revenue?”
Publications become more appealing when they have multiple sources of income rather than depending heavily on legal notices or one major advertiser. Events, digital marketing services and a healthy mix of revenue can strengthen a company’s position, as can operating in a growing community.
Entrepreneurs and independent owners are stepping forward
The emerging buyer pool extends well beyond traditional newspaper families and large publishing chains. “I think we’re seeing buyers from every walk of life,” April said. Some buyers previously worked in politics, marketing or at the newspapers they later acquired. Others are using nonprofit organizations to take responsibility for legacy publications.
Brady Walkinshaw’s interest in alternative newsweeklies is one example of a buyer entering from a different direction. April called his approach “particularly unique” because alternative publications have not recently experienced a great amount of acquisition activity. By finding new homes for titles in markets such as Seattle and Chicago, these buyers may help preserve publications that still serve distinctive audiences.
Regional clustering remains another important strategy, particularly for independent and family publishers. Acquiring a newspaper in a neighboring market can allow an owner to share business offices, human resources, printing and editorial resources. “It just makes a lot of sense because then an owner can leverage their overhead over more revenue, over more operations,” April explained.
These combinations can create practical efficiencies without severing a publication’s local connection. When an owner adds a newspaper one or two counties away, April said, “It just allows them to pool resources really across the board in news and editorial as well.”
Preserving journalism is a common thread
April believes many of today’s buyers are motivated by more than short-term financial returns. “The people that are acquiring these papers, they wanna see them continue,” she said. Sellers often want the same thing, particularly when a publication represents generations of family history and community service.
That does not mean every ownership transition will escape criticism. A sale to a large chain can bring complaints that a local buyer should have been found, while the actions of a local buyer may also face intense scrutiny. Still, April sees a clear pattern among the organizations acquiring community publications.
“I see it as a common thread,” she said after reviewing the recent buyer list. “I don’t see a buyer on here that has bought it just with profit in mind.” In her view, local media is no longer the kind of business that attracts buyers solely in pursuit of easy financial returns. The people investing in these institutions generally understand both the challenges and the public role of the work.
April pointed to companies such as Nelson Media Company and CherryRoad Media as examples of owners working in challenging or very small markets. “They all have a focus on preserving journalism in those communities,” she said.
A stronger foundation for optimism
April is more optimistic about independent local news than she was five years ago, when the COVID-19 pandemic created extraordinary uncertainty. “The way that the market has steadied, you know, really since 2024, I find very encouraging,” she said.
Her optimism comes partly from the diversity of buyers now entering the market. It is also supported by growing philanthropy, new nonprofit organizations and the continued formation of for-profit local media companies. “I think it all shows a commitment to the importance of local news and information,” April said.
The business model will continue to change, as will the identities and strategies of buyers. Yet April sees no indication that communities have lost their need for dependable local information. “I don’t think that anything is showing us that the need and the desire and the audience for local information is going away,” she said.
For publishers worried about who will carry their work forward, that may be the most encouraging signal in today’s transaction market: Buyers are still coming, and many of them care deeply about what local journalism means to the communities it serves.
|
|
|
Comments
No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here