Reprints Leap From Print To Web

Posted
By: Steve Outing The reprint business is just beginning to come out of the "old world"

and into the new. Instead of consumers calling a newspaper to get

reprints of an article, they will increasingly use or be referred to the

Web - where the sales and delivery process can be handled by

automated systems.



But more than taking something old (selling reprints) and making it new,

the online reprint business also presents new opportunities - such

as charging consumers for making photocopies of articles (instead of

losing revenues when they do it themselves); charging for Web links to

an article (which are typically made for free); and easily allowing

other Web sites to republish articles for a fee (instead of having a

human staff member deal with permissions).



Online reprint sales may not float a news Web site, but they do

represent an interesting new revenue stream and a way to reduce

resources devoted to selling reprints the "old-fashioned" way. You can

also gain insight into how people use your publication's content.



Industry leader



Seattle-based iCopyright.com is

the leader in this trend, and it's beginning to expand its services to

smaller publishers. The company is still relatively new, and thus far

has only a few media partners. In the newspaper world, iCopyright works

with the Los Angeles Times, Indianapolis Star-News and the

American City Business Journals chain.



iCopyright partners include a reprint tag at the bottom of their

articles on the Web. With stories in the Star-News, for instance,

site users have these options:



Buy formatted PDF (Adobe Acrobat) copies of articles for

self-printing. A single copy is free, but additional copies cost $1 each

(with a drop to 75 cents if over 1,000 copies are ordered). Buy

formatted e-mail copies of articles for 20 cents each. (To send an

article to up to five friends, it's free.) Buy a photocopy license

for an article, based on the number of copies you wish to make. (Free

for a single copy, otherwise 75 cents per copy.) License the right

to display articles on their own Web sites for $100.


Some sites also sell links to their articles, allowing another Web site

to include a headline linked back to the original story. That may look

like an odd model - charging a fee for something that's generally

considered to be free to do on your own - but it seems to work.



BizJournals.com (American Cities' Internet subsidiary) executive vice

president Tim Bradbury says the idea is simply to allow people to

pay to get a verified link to his publications' articles. A community of

users that seems to be comfortable paying for links is the public

relations profession, he says.



While BizJournals articles are stored on the Web with "permanent" URLS

(that is, the link should work long term), other news sites move current

articles into paid archives after a set time. For such sites, including

the Star-News, the idea of selling links makes sense -

because permanent URLs can be sold that will always work even after a

news site has moved an article into its archives. Link buyers pay for

that added value.



For most publisher deals with iCopyright, revenues from content reprint

sales are shared between iCopyright and the client publisher. Often,

there's no set-up fee to start the service.



Do the right thing



iCopyright vice president of content services Bill Burger says

one core idea behind his company's model is to make it economically

viable to sell low-volume reprints digitally. Physical-world reprint

departments (especially at magazines) typically don't want to deal with

a reader who calls in wanting 100 copies of an article that mentioned

his company. So they price that amount prohibitively high, which turns

many small buyers away.



By automating the process, says Burger, the price can be lowered and

it's still possible to make money on small orders. That business person

can use the Web to buy 100 copies of a Star-News article, which

he can print out himself after buying the right to do so, for $100. By

offering a reasonable price, a publisher can entice payment. Inflated

physical-world reprint pricing for low volumes by contrast can turn away

potential customers, who either do without or copy an article by

themselves and skip any payment.



The core principle behind iCopyright is "allowing the customer to do the

right thing," says Burger. The system does not emphasize security, but

rather convenience - making it easy for an online user who wants

copies of an article or wishes to use it on his or her own Web sites to

pay for a licensing agreement. But any purchase is basically voluntary.

It's simple enough for anyone to e-mail an article to a thousand

friends, or print out an article from the Web and photocopy it for a

hundred people in their office.



The business model here is that if you give online users the means to

easily pay for what they want, most will. Sure, a certain percentage

will cheat. That's life. But the net gain is new money that you

otherwise wouldn't see.



News archive implications



This model is used today primarily on current articles on content Web

sites, but where it gets interesting is when the concept is applied to

news archives. On most Web newspaper sites today, when a user finds an

article, he pays $1.50, $1.95 or $2.95 (the most common pricing right

now) to download it.



Envision the iCopyright model applied to newspaper archives. Find an

article, then you are presented with other options. Pay to e-mail copies

to colleagues, or to present the article on your own Web site or

intranet, etc.



iCopyright's system is not currently hooked into newspaper archive

systems, but should be in the future (most likely via relationships with

systems commonly used by newspaper Web sites, like Mediastream's

Newslibrary service).



How much to charge?



In terms of pricing for digital reprint or forwarding rights, there are

yet no solid guidelines. One client started out charging $250 for a Web

reprint permission, Burger says, but later realized that that was too

high and lowered it. He suggests that lower rates will bring in more

customers, and ultimately more revenue.



In contrast, another client started charging $5 for verified links to

its stories, and succeeded in selling quite a few of them. But these

links turned out to be valuable and the price was raised several times

over. The result: a net gain in revenues because customers appreciated

the value of the links enough to keep buying them even at a higher rate.

(Burger acknowledged that selling links has not represented a large

amount of money, but there were enough orders to recognize the

trend.)



In general, keep pricing low. Because such sales are voluntary and

honesty-based, too-high pricing will just encourage potential buyers to

cheat and pay you nothing.



Burger says that publishers' natural inclination seems to be to price

too high - but as they gain experience, many realize that lower

prices are to their benefit.



What can you make?



Frankly, news publishers aren't overly optimistic that offering online

reprints will bring in a ton of money. Star News online services

director Bob Jonason says the iCopyright-enabled sales have been

modest so far - but the service has been live only since mid-June.

Last month, between 1,400 and 1,500 users purchased reprint rights to

articles (and in many cases just forwarded single copies of articles to

friends for free).



Sports content has been among the most popular purchases, and he's seen

a lot of activity from corporations and colleges, whose people want

copies of articles that mention them.



In the past, the Star-News and its Web site have been contacted

daily by readers wanting to put a story on their own Web sites or link

to a story. So part of the motivation for automating the permissions

process is to eliminate that drain on staff time. Jonason says the

company also felt it was important to signal to readers and online users

the value of its articles, by flagging them as copyrighted and putting a

price on their re-use.



BizJournal's Bradbury says he too didn't get involved with iCopyright

expecting to make lots and lots of money. The motivation was to meet

customer desires (many people requested it), and to gain knowledge of

how the company's content gets used (that is, how and to who does it get

distributed beyond the newspapers' readers and online users).



Bradbury also says that at this time he's not all that interested in

promoting digital reprint sales. If they find it, great, but the

company's approach is "very passive" about marketing the

iCopyright-enabled reprint purchases.



Bradbury thinks that the print-based reprints business will continue to

thrive - and not be cannibalized by digital reprint services. But

other observers suggest that Web-enabled reprints could eventually

obviate the need for traditional print reprint services departments at

newspapers and magazines.



Enabling the little guys



The next phase in iCopyright's strategy is to open up its services to

smaller publishers. Earlier clients have had to work with the company to

integrate iCopyright's services into their publishing systems -

which sometimes took weeks or months to implement. At this writing,

iCopyright was close to releasing a new "self-serve" system that will

allow any publisher to sign up and start selling digital reprints.



According to a company spokesman, this solution will work even for those

news sites that publish only a small number of articles weekly or

monthly. Clients go through a Web form sign-up process, and at the end

are instructed to insert snippets of customized code into their HTML

pages.



iCopyright's principal competition comes from the Copyright Clearance Center. That

entity handles licensing of various forms of content. Like iCopyright,

it automates permissions, but the CCC does not actually deliver content

on behalf of client publishers as does iCopyright. Nor does CCC promote

itself as specializing in working with news publishers.



Other recent columns



In case you missed recent Stop The Presses!, here are links to

the last few columns:



You're Probably Charging Too Much Online, Wednesday, November 8 OK,

It's Time to Get Serious About Audio, Wednesday, November 1

Is Now the Time to Start Charging for Your Content?, Wednesday, October 25



Get Stop The Presses! by e-mail



If you would like to get e-mail delivery of the Stop The Presses!

column, there are two options:



1) Text e-mail. I send out a text e-mail message containing a

brief description of the current column, along with a URL link to the

actual column on the E&P Web site. To receive these regular

reminders, sign up here.



2) HTML e-mail. If you prefer to receive the entire column, you

can have it delivered to you as an HTML e-mail message whenever a new

column is published. Sign up here.



Steve





Got a tip? Let me know about it If you have a newsworthy item

about the online news/interactive news media business, please send me a

note.



---



This column is written by Steve

Outing for Editor & Publisher Online. Tips, letters and feedback

can be sent to Steve at steve@planetarynews.com





Copyright 2000, Editor & Publisher.

Comments

No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here