Richmond Daily Offers Prominent 'Regret' Over Segregation Fight

By: A Virginia newspaper is expressing regret for supporting the state's fight to maintain separate schools for blacks and whites in the 1950s.

The Richmond Times-Dispatch says in Thursday's editorial that it played a central role in the "dreadful doctrine" of Massive Resistance -- a systematic campaign by Virginia's white political leaders to block school desegregation. The newspaper says that "the record fills us with regret."

The newspaper took the unusual step of promoting the editorial on its front page. It comes on the eve of a conference in Richmond marking the 50th anniversary of the end of Massive Resistance.

The paper's Web site also offered a video on the subject. It can be viewed here:

http://www.eandppub.com/

An excerpt from the editorial follows. It is all at:

http://www.timesdispatch.com/

*

Sometimes the era seems ancient; sometimes it resembles yesterday. Fifty years ago Virginia had a rendezvous with destiny and came up wanting. It scorned human rights and the promise of the Declaration of Independence and instead took a course known as Massive Resistance. Tomorrow at the Capitol, the University of Virginia's Center for Politics will convene a conference on the chapter and its legacy.

Throughout the episode, Richmond Newspapers played a central role -- but not a centering one. The hour was ignoble. Editorials in The News Leader relentlessly championed Massive Resistance and the dubious constitutional arguments justifying its unworthy cause. Although not so intimately engaged, The Times-Dispatch was complicit. The record fills us with regret, which we have expressed before.

Massive Resistance inflicted pain then. Memories remain painful. Editorial enthusiasm for a dreadful doctrine still affects attitudes toward the newspaper. Many remember. We understand. Words have consequences. Artful paragraphs promoted ugly things. Stylish sentences salted wounds. Euphemism was profligate. As members of the Fourth Estate these pages did not keep a proper distance, either. The debate is over. It is done...

"Empathy" has been politicized and in some circles invites derision. Yet, properly understood, empathy leads away from hatred and cruelty and opens hearts to the loving-kindness men and women are intended to magnify. "As I would not be a slave, so I would not be a master," Abraham Lincoln said. Many simply could not see the harm they did to so many others. Jefferson trembled for his country when he reflected that God is just.

Yesteryear's words cannot be revoked. They endure on newsprint yellow and brittle, on microfilm, and in the computer files into which they have been translated. They belong to history, and history lives. It is well and good that the words be remembered, as a warning perhaps best. We will not forget.