Journalism without an audience is just creative writing

Posted

In the 20 years I’ve worked in the journalism industry, much time and ink has been spent on finding a new model to pay for local journalism.  

I’m here to tell you we’ve been fighting the wrong battle, or at least we have for the past 15 years. It’s time we reframe our thinking and efforts to focus on the two more important battles at hand.

Roughly 20 years ago, Joel and Laurie Kramer in Minnesota, Andy and Dee Hall in Wisconsin, John Thornton and Evan Smith in Texas, and Neil Morgan, Buzz Woolley and Lorie Hearn in San Diego all established nonprofit local news organizations. (MinnPostWisconsin WatchTexas TribuneVoice of San Diego and iNewsource, respectively.) Those organizations built on the funding model of public media, without the costs of broadcast towers and the publishing style of newspapers, without the printing presses or delivery drivers. Some five years later, they came together in New York to create the Institute for Nonprofit News (INN) to share their lessons and stories and help them refine the business model.

It worked. Nonprofit news is a viable model to support local journalism at scale. Period. Full stop. 

Now, it’s not the only model. What Jeff Elgie and the team are doing with Village Media in Canada and what Ken Doctor is doing with Lookout on the West Coast are other viable models to support local journalism, among others. They should be emulated and spread, too.

My point, however, is that the models are there. The people are not.

I’ve been thinking about this for a while. I tried the idea on for size with several friends and confidants at the Knight Media Forum in Miami in February. No one looked at me like I had six arms. But I hadn’t quite put all the pieces together. It all came together for me when a friend shared an article from Prospect Magazine in the U.K. Here are a couple of choice quotes:

“People watch a lot less television news than they did 10 years ago and read far fewer printed newspapers, and the number who go to online news sites — rather than relying on social media, search engines, aggregators and the like — is stagnant at best. So is the number of people willing to pay for online news. These trends have for years wreaked havoc on the traditional business of news, leading to thousands of layoffs in newsrooms across the U.K. But they do not seem to leave the public feeling lost.”

Or this: “The contract isn’t coming apart because people can’t access journalism but because they increasingly don’t. People still want reliable, relevant information from sources independent of those in power in business and government. In fact, mountains of research suggest that people appreciate the ideal aspirations of journalism and want news that helps them understand the world, offers a range of perspectives, and maintains independence from those it covers. The contract is coming apart because much of the public does not believe [that] actually existing journalism offers this.” Ouch. 

It turns out that while we have been facing inward, chasing the latest pivot, another layoff or the trendiest trend, we forgot to think about our audiences. And they’re tuning out, disengaging or, frankly, just forgetting about us. And that’s doubly dangerous.

Journalism without an audience is just creative writing. And it’s unsustainable. 

Right now, our industry must grapple with two priorities.

First, we must engage with the generational work of convincing Americans that news is a civic and philanthropic priority. It’s something that every community needs and should be funded like other civic institutions — through a mix of earned revenue, philanthropy and government support. Efforts like NewsMatchPress Forward and the work of every individual news outlet are driving us toward a day when this is a common understanding. And I believe we are on track to succeed in this effort some years down the road. We must keep this effort up and even accelerate the work.

Where we are truly falling down, however, is connecting with our audiences. For years, as our industry rocketed toward the bottom, those of us on the inside could comfort ourselves with the knowledge that we were serving more people than ever before with news. At some point later — in the COVID era — that trend turned around. People were turning away from news.

With some exceptions and ups and downs, that hasn’t changed. And it’s time we got serious about it. Having a devoted base of loyal readers and donors is not enough. To live up to its highest ideals, journalism needs to reach audiences at scale. It needs to serve audiences at scale. It needs to be for all the people.

I wish this were a column where I could say, “And here’s the solution.” I wish I had the solution, but I don’t. Like the model to support local journalism, the solution will likely involve multiple solutions.

This is a call to action and a call for innovation.

What is the next Documenters program, CityBureau’s decade-old program to involve the community in reporting? What is the next Outlier Media that leverages SMS to understand and meet community information needs?

This is a call to action for funders to invest not just in producing journalism or refining the system that supports journalism but also in finding and meeting the audience where they are.

This is a call to the journalism support organizations to focus not just on finding and optimizing audiences who are likely to give but also on the whole audience. To invest in reaching people who aren’t likely donors, as well as those who are.

This is a call for boldness and dissatisfaction with the status quo of who we’re reaching and how we’re serving them.

Let’s set our sights high now while we still can. The people need us, and we need them.

Jonathan Kealing is a long-time journalist at the local and national level who now works to strengthen collaboration and audience growth among INN's network of nonprofit newsrooms and develops partnerships and services that help them meet their missions and increase the reach and impact of their journalism.

Comments

1 comment on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here

  • ThePaper

    This is a very good point. I can mainly add that not only are the users not there like they used to be, newspapers have been pushing readers away from their money making product for 20 years now. I started working at our local newspaper in 1999 as a graphic designer. I also took over IT and being the webmaster in the early years. We were one of the few local newspapers to have a site up and running in 1998. I've spent over 20 years trying to find the solution to how local newspapers can make it in today's world (i.e. the internet). Every single time I come to the same conclusion. It's not the newspapers, it's the internet that is the problem. You can believe what you want but the internet has not only destroyed newspapers themselves, but also news in general. News on the internet has basically turned into another form of entertainment. I don't know many people that actually value the online news they read, but do feel comfort when finding articles that align with their views. Everyone was lied to by tech companies in the early days and newspapers really took the bait. How? They were given numbers in the millions for people coming to visit their website. What newspaper wouldn't want that? It was only around 4-5 years later that they dropped counting Hits, as opposed to Views and/or Users. The hits were a joke of a way to measure a website. If you recall, every single thing on a webpage counted as a hit. Every link, photo, headline, etc... So if you loaded up your site with a bunch of junk, you too could get millions of hits ... despite them being a useless metric. By then newspapers had already started to move full-forward into making it on the internet. For small, local newspapers, they will never be able to scale up enough to make it work without another means of income. After all these years, nothing has really changed. When COVID came, the newspaper I worked for shut down. Me and two other employees purchased it and have it up and running today. We purchased it because we were lucky enough to serve communities that truly value what a community is, and what community news is. It's not clickbait or an attractive headline to get people to click on it. Local news is simply everything, and just about anything, that has to do with the community. No gimmicks, no clickbait, and no addiction to our product is necessary. Moving forward should always involve bringing the best parts of the past with you.

    Friday, June 6 Report this