By: Mathew Ingram | GigaOM
There’s been much sound and fury in media circles about a leaked internal presentation from
The Oregonian that lays out the newspaper’s goals for its web content and sets performance measurements for reporters and editors.
New York Times writer David Carr used the document as an example of how media outlets are compensating writers in part on traffic, and Ryan Chittum of the
Columbia Journalism Review described it as institutionalizing the “hamster wheel” approach — one that values shameless click-bait rather than value-added journalism.
Comments
No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here